\n Read how family mediation helped Tyler and Abi <\/div>\n
\n
Tyler and Abi\u2019s case was referred to NFM mediators following the initial directions hearing at the court.<\/p>\n
Tyler had applied for contact to be defined. He felt that his ex-wife Abi, was limiting contact in an obstructive way. They have two children, Aaron, 9, and Madison, 11.<\/p>\n
At the start Abi said Tyler did not deserve any more than minimal contact as he had left the family for a younger woman, and that the children did not really want to have much to do with their father. The Court adjourned their case for six weeks for them to try mediation.<\/p>\n
After initial separate Mediation Information and Assessment Meetings (MIAMs) it was apparent each parent saw the other very much as the source of the problem.\u00a0 Abi felt very angry at \u201cbeing dragged to court\u201d whereas Tyler felt he had no choice as he was in danger of losing his relationship with Aaron and Madison.<\/p>\n
The first joint mediation session was challenging.\u00a0 Abi took every opportunity to criticise Tyler for leaving her, and he, in turn, accused her of taking his children away from him.<\/p>\n
However, the mediator, Martin, was able to help them see that both were hurting in different ways. Both were afraid of loss: Tyler\u2019s fear of losing the children was obvious, and Abi was able to admit that having lost her husband to a younger woman, she was also afraid of losing the children who might see John\u2019s new partner, Natalie, as more fun.<\/p>\n
Later sessions focused on reaffirming their roles as parents and reassurances that neither need \u201close\u201d the children. They began to look at the situation from the children\u2019s point of view, caught in the middle of Tyler and Abi\u2019s obvious anger and frustration, and old enough to be quite aware of the conflict and bitterness.<\/p>\n
Abi was able to appreciate that Natalie did not want to compete for the children\u2019s affections and indeed was quite nervous about how to respond to them. Tyler was able to see that he needed to go gently in introducing Natalie to the children rather than demand his rights.<\/p>\n
They agreed they wanted to test a programme of contact and built in a review of how things had gone for three months later. This provided a useful \u2018safety net\u2019 as both parents were anxious that their plan might fail. The court was informed of the initial outcome and adjourned the case for Tyler and Abi to test their arrangements. After the review meeting, Tyler felt able to withdraw his application for defined contact.<\/p>\n
At the three month review, both Tyler and Abi agreed to continue the arrangements.<\/p>\n
\u201cI think a bit of the bitterness I felt towards my ex-husband will always be with me, but I do feel the mediation process started the healing,\u201d says Abi. \u201cLife isn\u2019t perfect, and we realise it won\u2019t be the same as before but I think we have all moved on and Aaron and Madison are both now much more settled.\u201d<\/p>\n
This is a real case study from our trained\u00a0mediators, though names have been changed to protect identities<\/em><\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n \n <\/div>\n\n ","protected":false},"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","hc_topic":[130],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nfm.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/help_centre\/35479"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nfm.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/help_centre"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nfm.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/help_centre"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nfm.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"hc_topic","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nfm.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hc_topic?post=35479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}